Why does Paul give so much attention to his personal relationship with the Thessalonians in 1 Thessalonians 1-3?
Paul’s emphasis on his personal relationship with the Thessalonians was strategic. This relational emphasis was used to insure the church of his affections for them, remind the church of the loving and blameless service demonstrated amongst them, even in the face of persecution, in order to lay a foundation for exhortations regarding Christian living and doctrinal instructions to promote peace and clarity regarding the second coming of Christ and the resurrection of the dead (DPHL, 932).
Paul’s introduction is filled with gratitude for the Thessalonian example. Their acceptance of the Gospel, love and service for one another, imitation of Paul, and joy in persecution led to a strong testimony for Jesus Christ that became known in all of Macedonia and Achaia (1 Thess. 1:2-10). Paul then reminded the Thessalonians of his coming to them in gentleness, without creating a burden, and not only in sharing the message of the Gospel, but also in sharing their lives. Paul, then, expressed his desires to return to Thessalonica and explained the reason Timothy was sent—to express this desire for continuing the work that had been started by establishing and exhorting the church in the faith (1 Thess. 3:1-5).
Paul concluded his letter with instructions on Christian living regarding sexual morality (1 Thess. 4:1-8). Additionally, the Thessalonians had lost several members who had passed away, leaving them grieving and concerned about the resurrection and the second coming of Christ. Perhaps they had missed it? Paul instructs them on the coming of the Lord and its significance for all who are in Christ whether dead or living that they might have peace (1 Thess. 4:13-5:11). Finally, Paul offers further instructions on how the Thessalonians should avoid idleness, encourage and lovingly serve one another with patience, pray without ceasing, and participate in the sanctifying work God had started in their lives (1 Thess. 5:12-28).
“Thessalonians, Letters to the”, Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2009. Accordance Bible Software Version. 931-938.
A brief answer for how Paul’s eschatology informs his exhortations within the Pastoral Letters.
For Paul, the Kingdom of God was an already not yet reality made possible through the work of Jesus Christ. God, through the Gospel had already provided salvation from the penalty of sin, was continuing to save Christians from the power of sin, and would upon Christ return, save Christians from the presence of sin (Vandersteldt, Kindle Location 782). When it comes to Paul’s eschatology the resurrection of Christ is central, for it provides the hope and the motivation for living a life of faith in the Gospel (DPHL, 265). A proper understanding of this Gospel and the person and work of Christ is crucial for salvation and proper worship of the God who delivers men from bondage to improper worship and sin’s curse.
The Gospel of Christ and its implications for living must be believed, proclaimed, held to, and defended from any perversion that threatened to destroy it or dilute it. An erroneous view of the Gospel, Christ, or His return would inevitably lead to confusion and perhaps sinful behavior. This was the case in the Thessalonian church who misunderstood the imminent return of Christ, leading some to a misguided understanding about work (DPHL, 266; 1 Thess. 5:12-14).
Paul commanded church leaders such as Timothy to teach sound doctrine and defend the faith (2 Tim. 2:15; 4:2; Titus 1:9). Exhortations for this and for cooperation in the sanctifying work of the Spirit flow from Paul’s eschatological understanding of the Christ event in God’s salvific history, the identity that Christians now have as being in Christ, and the future hope that Christians have in the resurrection and Christ’s return (DPHL, 665). False teachers were to be refuted and the Gospel continually proclaimed as motivation to obey—not just its past or present implications, but the future implications for those believing in the Gospel.
“Eschatology”, Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2009. Accordance Bible Software Version. 253-269.
“Pastoral Letters”, Dictionary of Paul and His Letters. Downers Grove, IL; Nottingham, England: IVP Academic; Inter-Varsity Press, 2009. Accordance Bible Software Version. 658-666.
Vanderstelt, Jeff. Gospel Fluency: Speaking the Truths of Jesus into the Everyday Stuff of Life. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2017. Kindle Edition.
Missionary kids, also known as MKs, belong to a special group of people known as third culture kids. David Pollock, co-author of Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds, describes a third culture kid as,
…a person who has spent a significant part of his or her developmental years outside the parents’ culture. The TCK frequently builds relationships to all of the cultures, while not having full ownership in any(13).
Cross-cultural experiences in the lives of MKs can lead to a rich, successful, and fulfilling life. However, these experiences can also lead to a life full of bitterness and unresolved grief in a troublesome quest to find one’s identity. Growing up in a mixture of cultures can complicate the MK’s quest for this answer.
Since personal culture is developed within the home, how is home defined when it constantly changes, and what affects does the change have on MKs? While it may be exciting to move to another culture, there is much loss, and not just on the first move. Moving back to the passport country after spending many years away also comes with loss. If the loss is not dealt with in a healthy way, MKs may suffer from unresolved gr ief. Pollock and Reken discovered that, for TCKs,
The biggest problem is unresolved grief. Grief that is not dealt with directly emerges in some way—in forms that are destructive and that can last a lifetime. That’s ‘bad grief,’ and it needs attention and resolution (83).
Parents and mission agencies must help their MKs deal with grief in a healthy way so that unresolved grief does not affect the development of personal identity. For a MK, home may change many times during childhood. Once integrated into a new culture, the new culture may become home. Some MKs still consider their passport culture home, yet they may feel lost when returning to their passport culture after spending time developing in a foreign culture. It is not hard to see why the concept of home can become complicated for MKs and how this can lead to challenges in the quest for identity.
ENTER THE IMAGO DEI…
Jeffrey F. Keuss, PhD professor and associate dean of Seattle Pacific University, and Professor Rob Willett believe MKs should move beyond an identity grounded in culture to an identity founded first within the doctrine of the Imago Dei—the Image of God. In an article titled The Sacredly Mobile Adolescent, Keuss and Willett have created a potentially helpful label for MKs called the sacredly mobile adolescent. This label establishes identity within the doctrine of the Imago Dei. They argue that when identity is understood in this manner, the transcendent rather than the physical cultural context, MKs can find greater purpose and security when dealing with the challenges of mobility. Rather than fixing their identity on culture, they find their identity in Christ. A MK that truly finds their identity in Christ is able to view the world with a missional mindset because they understand their role as being incarnational, as was Christ, in order to fulfill a higher purpose in being God’s ambassador to a lost world.
Sacredly mobile adolescents see the integration process as the incarnational means to bringing a message of hope to the world. This mindset also helps when the time comes to relocate because “sacredly mobile adolescents exemplify a new breed of youth that rather than fearing change can embrace change as normative within God’s economy” (22). Grief then is managed easier because the MK treasures their sacredly mobile role in taking the gospel to the nations. Keuss and Willett write,
Thinking of these young people as ‘sacredly mobile’ will help us challenge cultural fixity as the primary determinate of healthy and robust identity formation and replace it with the centrality of Imago Dei as the signifier to which the sign of youth should reference in both word and deed (23).
Parents can help their MK understand who they are according to Jesus Christ through regular discipleship in the home and a gospel-centered lifestyle that teaches children, 1. the benefits of grounding their identity in CHRIST, and 2. that our home is ETERNAL. In order for the message to take root, parents must clearly articulate the family’s divine calling to another culture in such a way that the MKs understand they too are missionaries. MKs are not simply missionary kids because they are kids of missionaries, they are truly missionaries themselves, and the mobility that comes with this divine assignment is sacred.
Parents then must exemplify the gospel of grace they are proclaiming within the temporary homes they occupy. The faith being proclaimed in a foreign culture must also be lived out in the temporary homes of missionary families. Any disconnect between the two can lead to a false understanding of God and potential doubt in the minds of MKs.
Keuss, Jeff and Rob Willett. “The Sacredly Mobile Adolescent: A Hermeneutic Phenomenological Study Toward Revising Of The Third Culture Kid Typology For Effective Ministry In A Multivalent Culture.” Journal Of Youth Ministry (Fall 2009): 7-24. Print.
Pollock, David C and R. E. Van Reken. Third Culture Kids: Growing Up Among Worlds. Boston: Nicholas Brealey Pub, 2009. Print.
Luke 15:1-32 – Lost Opportunities…or Opportunities Lost?
Luke 15:1 Now all the tax collectors and sinners were coming to hear him. 2 But the Pharisees and the experts in the law were complaining, “This man welcomes sinners and eats with them.”
Luke 15:3 So Jesus told them this parable: 4 “Which one of you, if he has a hundred sheep and loses one of them, would not leave the ninety-nine in the open pasture and go look for the one that is lost until he finds it? 5 Then when he has found it, he places it on his shoulders, rejoicing. 6 Returning home, he calls together his friends and neighbors, telling them, ‘Rejoice with me, because I have found my sheep that was lost.’ 7 I tell you, in the same way there will be more joy in heaven over one sinner who repents than over ninety-nine righteous people who have no need to repent.
Luke 15:8 “Or what woman, if she has ten silver coins and loses one of them, does not light a lamp, sweep the house, and search thoroughly until she finds it? 9 Then when she has found it, she calls together her friends and neighbors, saying, ‘Rejoice with me, for I have found the coin that I had lost.’ 10 In the same way, I tell you, there is joy in the presence of God’s angels over one sinner who repents.”
Luke 15:11 Then Jesus said, “A man had two sons. 12 The younger of them said to his father, ‘Father, give me the share of the estate that will belong to me.’ So he divided his assets between them. 13 After a few days, the younger son gathered together all he had and left on a journey to a distant country, and there he squandered his wealth with a wild lifestyle. 14 Then after he had spent everything, a severe famine took place in that country, and he began to be in need. 15 So he went and worked for one of the citizens of that country, who sent him to his fields to feed pigs. 16 He was longing to eat the carob pods the pigs were eating, but no one gave him anything. 17 But when he came to his senses he said, ‘How many of my father’s hired workers have food enough to spare, but here I am dying from hunger! 18 I will get up and go to my father and say to him, “Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you. 19 I am no longer worthy to be called your son; treat me like one of your hired workers.”’ 20 So he got up and went to his father. But while he was still a long way from home his father saw him, and his heart went out to him; he ran and hugged his son and kissed him. 21 Then his son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you; I am no longer worthy to be called your son.’ 22 But the father said to his slaves, ‘Hurry! Bring the best robe, and put it on him! Put a ring on his finger and sandals on his feet! 23 Bring the fattened calf and kill it! Let us eat and celebrate, 24 because this son of mine was dead, and is alive again—he was lost and is found!’ So they began to celebrate.
Luke 15:25 “Now his older son was in the field. As he came and approached the house, he heard music and dancing. 26 So he called one of the slaves and asked what was happening. 27 The slave replied, ‘Your brother has returned, and your father has killed the fattened calf because he got his son back safe and sound.’ 28 But the older son became angry and refused to go in. His father came out and appealed to him, 29 but he answered his father, ‘Look! These many years I have worked like a slave for you, and I never disobeyed your commands. Yet you never gave me even a goat so that I could celebrate with my friends! 30 But when this son of yours came back, who has devoured your assets with prostitutes, you killed the fattened calf for him!’ 31 Then the father said to him, ‘Son, you are always with me, and everything that belongs to me is yours. 32 It was appropriate to celebrate and be glad, for your brother was dead, and is alive; he was lost and is found.’”
Historical and Character Background
Luke’s gospel was written to a highly respected individual, Theophilus. Luke’s gospel is a historic account of the life and ministry of Jesus Christ. In this passage, Luke is providing the reader with a clear example of Christ’s love for the lost and the failure of certain religious leaders—the Pharisees. Luke does this by recording the parables Jesus taught when the Pharisees and experts of the law growled at His interaction with those considered impure—tax collectors and sinners. Each parable describes something that was once lost being found again.
In the time of Christ, tax collectors garnished taxes for the Herods who then paid tribute to Caesar. They were an identifiable social group and corruption was the norm in their daily operations. Usually tax collectors were looked down upon because they would garnish wages off of the top of taxes collected. Because the money passed through many hands it made stealing easy.
By the 3rd Century in Rome, a cadre of tax collectors was well established because of their keen ability to track down tax evasion and corruption. Josephus even mentions tax collectors in the account of the conquest of Antiochus Epiphanes. When Pompey conquered Judea in 63 BCE, the Jews ended up having to pay taxes to Rome…on top of their existing tithing and offering system. At the time of Julius Caesar, Jews paid a produce tax of 12.5% of the total crop!! With all other taxes combined, a Jewish farmer was taxed around 30-40% of his income. Jews also paid a tax called the angari which allowed Rome to use their human and animal labor for public works. Paying taxes to Caesar was viewed as treason by many Jews. Tax collectors were viewed as Jews that actually enabled Rome to rule over God’s people.
Pharisees viewed tax collectors as sinners who had no part in God’s kingdom. They were placed on the same level as the ‘unclean’ Gentiles.
“Sinners” was a word used to represent people incapable of being redeemed, and this word is almost always paired with tax collectors in the Gospels. Protestant tradition views the word as being used to describe those who fall far outside of the purity regulations enforced by the Pharisaic mind.
Jesus ate and spent time with sinners, who were viewed as genuinely wicked in the eyes of the general populace. Jesus seemed to accept sinners simply through the act of eating with them. There was a cultural and spiritual significance attached to with whom you ate.
Pharisees and experts of the Law
Sourced from the IVP Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels:
“… a distinct party in Judaism of the late Second Temple period, with their own vision of what Israel’s standing as God’s covenant people entailed. Characteristic of the Pharisaic position was their adherence to a body of traditional material (Gk paradosis) handed down “from the fathers,” which defined correct behavior in a number of ways and which represented both an interpretation of and a supplement to Pentateuchal Law. In the Gospels Pharisees are generally (though not quite universally) depicted as opponents of Jesus, critical of his behavior, hostile in their questions, malicious in their deliberations. In turn, their piety is attacked as hypocritical, their spiritual leadership is declared bankrupt, and they are charged with leading the nation to its doom. Through all the polemic the significant role played by the Pharisees in Jewish life in first-century Palestine is apparent.”
Five Pains, Four Joys
The Lost Sheep – Luke 15:3-7
Our first pain is found within the heart of a shepherd, who having 100 sheep, noticed one had been lost. Out of his role and responsibility of being a shepherd, and his care for his flock, the shepherd left the 99 sheep in open pasture so that he could restore his lost sheep to the flock. The sheep was lost, without guidance, and possibly experiencing pain and anxiety in its lost state. The shepherd ultimately found his lost sheep and carried it back to the flock atop his own shoulders. His reaction can be understood as full of joy, and evident in his proclamation to all of his friends and neighbors that his lost sheep had been found, and in his invitation to come celebrate the good news with him.
The Lost Coin – Luke 15:8-10
The second pain is found in the heart of a woman, who having 1o silver coins lost one of them. She searched her home, every nook and cranny, until she found her lost coin. Like the shepherd, she invited all of her friends to celebrate what had been found.
While many might have viewed this small coin as something insignificant, she did not. It is also possible that this silver coin belonged to a headdress which would signify she was engaged. In losing one of these coins she could have been seen as careless or as not valuing her future husband.
The Prodigal Son – Luke 15:11-32
The third pain is found in the heart of a father whose youngest son declares complete disinterest in remaining within the family. He asks his father to give him his inheritance early so that he may leave home. The fourth pain had to have been within the heart of his father when he realized that his son did not want him, but rather his possessions.
Pained, the father granted his rebellious son’s wish. His son left for a land of unclean sinners where he squandered his possessions. Once hitting rock bottom, the son found himself in painful, lonely despair . He then decided to return to his father to beg for forgiveness and to offer his labor as a hired servant so that he might pay his father back. In doing so, the son is not asking to be reinstated into the family.
But before the son reached home the father saw him on the road and ran out to greet him—something considered classless for a man to do. The father greeted his son with a kiss—a family greeting—and rejected his son’s offer of hired labor. Instead, he lavished his grace upon the son, placed a coat around him, a ring on his finger—probably signifying the family crest—and declared a party to celebrate the return of his prodigal son. The servants were commanded to prepare the fattened calf—a meal of a lifetime to which the whole town would have been invited. Imagine the joy in the hearts of this father and his prodigal son! What was lost had returned.
But the story does not end with the lost being found, as did the previous stories. Rather, we find our fifth pain within the bitter cold heart of an older brother. When the brother heard that his little brother had returned, and that there was a party, and that the fattened calf was to be cooked, he became disgruntled and refused to go into the home to celebrate. In doing so he disrespected his father—something punishable by beating. However, his father did not beat him. Rather, he went out from the party to ask his son to join them. The oldest son, who would receive a double portion of his father’s inheritance, questioned his father’s decision. He professed his unrelenting service for his father and wondered why he had received nothing while his brother had received such blessings. In doing so he revealed that he held the same desires his brother had held, but in a different a way. This brother was not interested in the father either, he just wanted his father’s stuff and he was trying to gain this stuff by being the good son.
And this is where our stories end—With Jesus Christ accusing the Pharisees and experts in the law of behaving like the bitter-cold older son—in what must have been a crowd of furious Pharisees and religious leaders.
The purpose of these parables was to rebuke the religious leaders for failing to do what God had intended them to do. It was the job of the priest to shepherd God’s flock. The priests were to connect people to God. Rather, they became blinded by their own self-righteousness and lost their ability to love those who needed them most. The tax collectors and sinners were the lost sheep, the lost coin, and the prodigal son. A good shepherd searches for the lost sheep. A poor woman or a bride-to-be would search for a precious lost coin. And they celebrate when the lost is found, inviting others to join them in the celebration.
The Pharisees lost their opportunity to fulfill their calling. Why? Because they looked down their noses at those opportunities. A good brother would have gone out to search for his lost little brother. A good brother would have pleaded with his little brother to return home. It was his job, and one of the reasons he would receive the larger inheritance. He was to become the leader of the family. It was his job to reconcile differences between the father and his sons. But rather than performing his role as big brother he became angry at his father’s gracious reception of his little brother back into the family.
And this is where we find the Pharisees, the bitter, cold-hearted big brothers. But this is also where we find ourselves left with a desire for the perfect big brother—Jesus, the good shepherd. Jesus left His home to search for the lost brothers despite the cost He knew it would have on Him to restore the lost sheep to the fold of God. He is teaching us through the story of the prodigal son, not only that we should rejoice when the lost brother has been found, but also that he came to save not only those who have tried to gain his blessings by being very bad, but also by being very good. We must repent not only for the bad things we have done, but also for the reason we ever did anything good in the first place. And we must trust in the work of our perfect big brother Jesus alone, for He came to save us, the lost.
Will you be a sensitive seeker and recognize “lost opportunities”? “Lost Opportunities” are the people around you that do not know Jesus Christ as personal Lord and Savior—the lost—and your ability to demonstrate God’s love to them—the opportunities. Or will you end up with opportunities lost? Ask yourself:
1. Do you find yourself looking down upon sinners or do you find yourself full of compassion toward them?
2. In what ways have you been like the big brother? In what ways have you been like the little brother?
3. Are you willing to invite the lost into your home, dinner table, and community of believers? Will you go to them in their homes, dinner tables, and communities?
4. Specifically, will you find yourself so aware of what God has done for you that you are sensitive to the needs of sinners to experience God’s forgiveness and grace and…
5. Will you join in the search for the lost? No matter how wretched or self-righteous they may be?
from Jacobus Merlo Horstius (1597-1664)
Set my heart on fire with love for you, most loving Father,
and then to do your will, and to obey your commandments,
will not be grievous to me.
For to him that loves, nothing is difficult, nothing is impossible,
because love is stronger than death.
Oh, may love fill and rule my heart.
For then there will spring up and be cherished between you and me
a likeness of character and union of will,
so that I may choose and refuse as you do.
May your will be done in me and by me forever.
Robert E. Coleman: Master Plan of Evangelism
Timothy Keller: The Prodigal God N.T. Wright: Simply Jesus: Who He Was, What He Did, Why It Matters
The Roman rule of Judea began in 63 BC with the conquest of Jerusalem by Pompey. After capturing the city, killing the priests, and entering into the holy of holies, Pompey appointed a new high priest. A tax burden was placed on the Jews requiring tribute to Caesar. Antipater became governor and the city walls were rebuilt. From Antipater came Herod, who was briefly ousted in 40 BC by the Parthian revolt. The revolt did not last long however, and Herod the Great returned with Roman soldiers to reclaim his Judean throne. Thus began the reign of the Herods under Rome’s authority, to maintain order in a Jewish religious culture led by the Sadducees and the Pharisees, and occupied by Jews longing for their Messiah to come and establish God’s eternal Kingdom as promised in the Davidic covenant. However, the Jewish longing for a Messiah was guided by misconceptions, which ultimately led to the religious leaders’ rejection of their eternal King and His Kingdom.
The Roman occupation of Israel affected the lives of the land’s Jewish inhabitants in both positive and negative ways. On a positive note, although the Hellenization of the western world continued, Jewish culture remained the same. Jews were not forced to worship the Roman state cult, nor were they required to speak Greek. Plenty of opportunities existed for “aspiring social climbers to adopt the ways of the world” (Tomasino, 278). With such adoption came career paths that led to prosperity. The religious activities of the Jewish people continued, allowing the religiously pure Pharisees to continue their strict adherence to the Law and the temple activities continued. Furthermore, there was peace, stability, and a level of security for Israel, so long as they did not cause any problems that might have required Roman intervention or discipline.
On a negative note however, Hellenization was continuing to spread, posing a threat to Jewish religion and culture. Roman soldiers could at times oppress the Jews by requiring their forced labor for State projects. But oppression was mostly realized in the pocketbooks of the Jews. The Roman Empire was an expensive operation to run, and the Jews had to pay in order to keep it running. In addition to the existing Jewish laws for tithes and offerings for their priests, there was now tribute to be paid through various taxes. These negatives resulted in a general disdain by the Jews for their Roman rulers.
Disdain led to resistance of various sorts. There was passive resistance by some Jews that played out through murmuring, complaining, cursing, cheating on taxes, and the occasional secretive cheering for groups of bandits who robbed the Romans (Tomasino, 283). On the other hand there was active resistance through various groups of freedom fighters. Josephus records these groups as the lestai, the sicarii, and the zealots. The lestai participated in a form of social banditry by steeling from Rome in order to give back to the Jews. The Sicarii were deadly assassins that targeted people in power, both Jewish and Gentile (Josephus, Jewish War 20.8.10). The zealots, so called for their religious and political zeal, were those who sought to restore God’s chosen nation through revolting against any foreign force ruling Israel (Josephus, Ant. 18.1.1).
Israel was God’s favored nation and race, leading Jews to wonder how much longer God would allow Rome, the massive pagan machine, to rule His chosen ones. The paganism of the Gentiles was being spread throughout the world and there was nothing that Israel could do on their own to stop it. A supernatural intervention was required (Tomasino, 289). There was a longing for the messiah, the super king who would restore the throne of David as God’s anointed one. This king would reunite Israel, defeat the unrighteous, and establish God’s righteous reign on earth forever (2 Sam. 7; Is. 9:1-7; 11:1-10; Jer. 23:5-6, Amos 9:11-12). To the Pharisaic mind, this would require a mighty warrior who held an ultimate value and strict adherence to God’s Law, for it was a low value and loose adherence to the Law that led to the previous destruction and oppression of God’s people by various nations. Thus the timing was ripe for this Messiah because the temple system had been restored, along with an outward commitment by the religious leaders to maintain purity and righteousness.
Surely the coming Messiah would greet the Pharisees with enthusiasm, offering praise for their strict commitment to remaining pure and protecting themselves from law. Their dedication to obeying the law by creating additional laws, or fences, to protect them from sinning would be seen as honorable by the coming super king. The Pharisees’ rejection of sinners and lack of engagement towards them guarded God’s chosen ones from impurity, thus being ready to usher in the reign of David’s heir. All of these visually righteous deeds flowed from a remembrance of covenant disobedience and a desire to avoid the same fate in the future. It was this understanding of the Messiah, and the conceived idea about how to remain obedient to the Law, that led to the Pharisees’ rejection of Jesus; for He did not meet them with enthusiasm, but with rebuke (Luke 7:29-35; Matt. 12). He tore down their guardrails and taught about a spiritual kingdom that even a tax collector could inherit.
The Pharisees did not accept Jesus’ actions and His teachings were often used to point to the self-righteous, unloving behavior of the Jewish religious leaders (Luke 18:9-14). Jesus taught against aggression towards Rome (Matt. 5:41). He violated their understanding of the Law—especially the Sabbath laws (Mishnah, Tractate Sab. 7.1-4; Matt. 12). He taught a message that reversed the social order put in place by the religious elite. He taught a message of servant leadership where the first becomes last and the least becomes the greatest. Those that had been deemed unclean and rejected—the sinners, tax collectors, Samaritans, and women—were being accepted into the coming kingdom of God. Jesus ate with these sinners, thus appearing to defile Himself through communion and fellowship with impure people.
When Jesus offered rebuke, it was often directed to the Pharisees for their self-righteousness and obsession to the law that led to the exclusion of the very people who needed them most. Rather than being ambassadors of God’s grace to the lost, they looked down their noses at the lost as unworthy, thus placing themselves on a pedestal and diminishing their own sinfulness. Christ was controversially fulfilling the Law and drawing attention back to the original purpose of God’s Law—to love God and to love others. When the people failed, the religious leaders should have been the tools of grace God intended them to be, to help draw them into the repentance God made possible through the sacrificial system of the Law. But not even the miraculous signs of Christ could melt the cold hearts of the Pharisees; the leaders unfit to lead God’s people (Zech. 11:4-6a).
Ultimately however, it was the sovereign plan of God that led to the Pharisees’ rejection of Christ (Isa. 53:1; 53:3; 49:4; Ps. 69:8; Zech. 11:12-13; Matt. 27:21-23; 26; 14-15; John 1:11; 5:43; 19:13-15 Acts 4:25-28; Eph. 1:1-11). The Pharisees’ hearts were hard (Isa. 8:9-10a; John 12:37-40). Jesus was the prophesied stone rejected by the Jews (Ps. 18:22; Matt. 21:42-43), and their unbelief led to the Messiah’s rejection of their own self-righteous behavior (Zech. 11:8a; Matt. 23:33). Jesus was saddened by their unbelief and stopped ministering to them (Zech. 11:9; Matt. 12:10-11). But it was through the hard hearts and inability of the Pharisees to lead people into a right relationship with God that Jesus came to fulfill God’s covenant with Abraham. He become the perfect sacrifice and blessing for all nations. The super king had come, but to establish a spiritual kingdom in which all who believed in His name could take part (John 5:24).
Elwell, Walter A. and Robert W. Yarbrough. Readings from the First Century World. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1998. Print.
Danby, Herbert. The Mishnah. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1933. Print.
Ferguson, Everett. “Jews in the early Roman Empire.” Pages 427-430 in Backgrounds of Early Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003. Print.
Josephus, Flavius. The Works of Flavius Josephus, Complete and Unabridged. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, Inc., 1987. Accordance Electronic Version.
The Holy Bible, English Standard Version with Key Numbers (ESVS). Crossway Bibles, 2011. Print.
Sailhamer, John H. “The Messiah and the Hebrew Bible.” Pages 5-23 in Journal of the Evangelical Theolgoical Society 44.1 (March 2001). Print.
Skarsaune, Oskar. 165-171 in In the Shadow of the Temple: Jewish Influences on Early Christianity. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2008. Print.
Tomasino, Anthony J. “Oppression, Resistance, and Messianic Hopes.” Pages 278-306 in Judaism Before Jesus: The Events & Ideas that Shaped the New Testament World. Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2003. Print.
Recently we asked you to send in any questions you might have for us and we were excited to receive many questions from our partners and friends. So, we will spend the next several blog posts replying to some of your questions. Here we go!
Q1: What are the top 2 things we love the most about The Italians & their culture?
Life with Italians. The culture is laid back and the Italians are warm, helpful, and friendly.
The fresh & simple food!
Q2: What are the top 2 things that have been the most difficult about our transition?
The bureaucracy! “Life” takes longer in Italy.
The language barrier
Q3: What is the healthcare like?
Well, thankfully we haven’t really had to use it yet outside of going to the Farmacia (Pharmacy). Italy has socialized medicine. The pharmacists are like doctors. You can go into a Pharmacy, describe your ailment to the pharmacist & they will give you the medicine you need to buy.
Thankfully the Italian pastor of our church is a doctor and he is very helpful! A week after we arrived in Italy Lila got a bad ear infection. We took her to our pastor/doctor’s home, he checked her out and then wrote her a prescription. We took the written prescription and had it filled at a Pharmacy…No insurance needed and it was not very expensive. However, we have a friend here that is still waiting to get xrays, bloodwork, etc. so that he can schedule surgery (and then wait some more) to have painful kidney stones removed. He cannot believe that America is looking to mimic a healthcare system such as the one here.
Q4: What is grocery shopping and meal planning like?
Naples has grocery stores (Supermercato), like the U.S. There are also many small markets, fruit stands (fruttivendolo), deli shops (salumeria) and bread shops (panificio). Typically, Italians don’t do large grocery shopping. They buy their perishables (fruit, vegetables, meat & bread) daily.
We shop at the large grocery stores AND the small. We like to visit our community bread store, fruit stand, coffee shop (bar) and ice cream store (gelateria). We are working on developing relationships with the owners & workers there and we have already had opportunities to share the gospel. We were even invited to one shop owner’s party for his daughter’s 7th birthday.
Meal planning has been difficult. Lauren does her best, but with an irregular schedule planning anything can be difficult.
Q5: Ikea has a grocery store?
First off, Clay thinks this question is…well….stupido :-). But, Yes! It features all Ikea food products from Sweden. Ikea is the only place we buy salmon because they usually have their smoked salmon on sale for 4-5 Euros!
If you have any questions feel free to include them in the comment section below. In the next post we will answer the following questions:
What is Lila Mae doing all day?
How is the language barrier? Are we picking up Italian?
What does an average day look like for our family?
Is the pizza/coffee really the best in the world?
Can you share any examples of witnessing encounters? YES WE CAN!! Stay tuned…..